Enormous preparations, both pragmatic and ceremonial, are under way for the crowning of King Charles III and Queen Camilla next month in London. When the official invitation was prepared, people’s attention was drawn to the foliate head, the “Green Man” at the bottom.
Was it a sign to those who know of the king’s Pagan sympathies? Was it just a sort of “spirit of Britain” thing? After all, those could be Scottish thistles to him, and what about those old-fashioned red/white roses? And the oak leaves?
The Guardian, not a reliable source of religion news, burbled, “Is Charles planning a pumpimg pagan [sic] party?”
Here is a historian’s view (no, not Ronald Hutton this time), but Francis Young, author of the newly released Twilight of the Godlings: The Shadowy Beginnings of Britain’s Supernatural Beings from Cambridge University Press.
Young has an article in The Spectator (UK) on the Green Man and the king:
The Green Man is an intriguing figure. He is not, as many claim, an ancient fertility god, but something much stranger: a twentieth-century creation, a deity invented in modern Britain. In 1939 the folklorist Lady Raglan published an influential article which drew together several disparate strands to construct an imagined character whom all written sources, strangely, had previously failed to mention. According to Lady Raglan, the foliate heads often found in medieval churches portrayed a figure who was commemorated by pubs named ‘The Green Man’ and the dancer bedecked with foliage (known as ‘Jack-in-the-Green’) who was part of May Day festivities. Hiding in plain sight in churches, the Green Man embodied ongoing pagan [sic] sympathies.
Many historians and folklorists have debunked Lady Raglan’s claims. There were no pagans in high medieval Britain, stonemasons often indulged in bizarre visual jokes or favoured a particular motif for no apparent reason, and a ‘green man’ in early modern England just meant a man who dressed in green. But the debunking didn’t work; people had already come to believe that a god called the Green Man existed. A brisk trade in clay and resin replicas of foliate heads in Britain’s churches helped. No one was worshipping the Green Man at this point, but the notion that a deity cheekily lurked in churches tickled mid-century Britons’ desire for a little light-hearted subversion at a time when the Church was losing its grip on national life.
But I have one of those resin heads hung by my front door (a sign to those who know), and it means something more to me.
ADDED: Sebastian Milbank, editor of the British “contrarian conservative” magazine The Critic, offers a Christian genealogy of the Green Man: “The Green Man is a Christian Symbol.”
3 thoughts on “Green Man Image Starts ‘Pagan King’ Chatter”
The Green Man is a nice touch, but… is that seriously the quality of calligraphy one gets on a royal coronation invite these days?
Penmanship is a lost art. They don’t even teach people how to write nowadays. They only teach folks how to “print”, not write and many kids can’t read actual writing! This is true across the planet where English is the native tongue. Sigh.
About the Green Man. Modern mythology is mythology. New figures may hold useful meanings related to figuring out older times and peoples and such.
I imagine that a member of the House of Windsor like the Prince of Wales would face–if they had any Pagan sentiments at all–considerable obstructions and hobbles to expressing any of them very much at all. If the Green Man is a little nod to Charles and his Pagan inclinations (if he has any)–then that’s fine by me.
If, following his coronation, he commands–the State religion of the United Kingdom is from this moment Wicca–Good on for us, I guess!
About the calligraphy. Appears hand-lettered to me.
Comments are closed.