The Da Vinci Code: A Pagan date movie
M. and I are not what you would call “early adopters,” other than perhaps when we bought a Jeep TJ right after they were introduced in 1997. (We still have it.) So this is not exactly a cutting-edge review of The Da Vinci Code.
It is rated PG, which could just as well stand for “Partially or Predominately or Pretty Gnostic.” Given that two newer films, The Devil Wears Prada and A Prairie Home Companion had opened in Colorado Springs, site of our delayed anniversary Day in the City, I was surprised that M. voted for Da Vinci. But she argued that it would be the best to see on the big screen (the “Euro porn” factor—old buildings, cityscapes, conspiracies) and, of course, we would be voting with our ticket dollars against those who called for a boycott.
Afterwards, eating at Shuga’s on South Cascade Avenue, we decided that this was one case where the movie was better than the book. For me, the book just went “in one eye and out the other.” Having read Holy Blood, Holy Grail back when it was published, I knew the whole Priory of Sion story, and not much about Dan Brown’s novel, other than perhaps the initial murder of the curator in the Louvre, stayed with me.
As to the story’s cinematic incarnation, Tom Hanks has evolved into the thinking man’s action hero, Audrey Tautou’s wide-eyed “Who? Me?” expression is bearable, and, most of all, Ian McKellen as the duplicitous Grail expert seems to have such a twinkle in his eye, as though he is saying, “Look at me! An old man, yet I have this juicy part. And I don’t have to endure a long fake beard as I did for Gandalf.”)
He is such a pleasure to watch. I was late in discovering him as an actor—I did not realize how good he was until the “English fascist” Richard III of 1995. At that movie’s opening scene, when the glass-domed ticker-tape machine chatters out “Richard . . . Gloucester . . . is . . . at . . . Shrewsbury”—or however it went—my jaw dropped, and I said, “This is going to be wonderful.” And it was. (Perhaps it’s time to rent it again.)
Alfred Molina turns in a competent performance as the scheming Opus Dei bishop.
The story of Sophie (Audrey Tautou) fits the archetype of the Lost Princess—one archetype that Jung never mentioned. Back when I was researching Gleb Botkin and the Church of Aphrodite for Her Hidden Children, I read an article discussing the Anastasia claimant, the woman who was known here as “Anna Anderson.”
Botkin, who had known the real Anastasia, the daughter of the last Russian czar, had supported the claimant when she surfaced in Berlin in the 1920s. He was living in New York City at the time, and a newspaper paid his way to Berlin. Later, around 1968, he officiated at her wedding to one of her American supporters, in his capacity as hierarch of the Church of Aphrodite—that was just months before he died.
At any rate, the article said that the Anastasia story captured so many people’s imaginations because of the “lost princess” theme. And if you equate “princess” with “psyche,” you could put a psychologically Gnostic twist on it. Or “princess” with Sophia, of course.
All the mainstream Catholic denouncers of the movie, however, cannot confront one thing. They can go on and on about how the Church canonized Mary Magdalene and does not really oppress women (don’t get my ex-Catholic wife started on that), but they refuse to confront how the book and movie speak to a need for the Divine Feminine. They just can’t. It’s not in their playbook.
I am not equating Paganism with Gnosticism. Briefly, I consider the key difference to be that most Gnosticism considers this world to be a trap, a tomb, a mistake—pick your metaphor. Michael York discusses the difference at length in his book Pagan Theology. It’s a short, pithy book, and you should buy it.
But I do think that Pagans, like Gnostics, can stand outside the current religious mainstream and see what is missing.
But be careful with Dan Brown: he does make up some stuff wholesale. Alexander Pope did not give the eulogy at Isaac Newton’s funeral.
You want a conspiracy theory? Maybe movies like this are the result of a plot by European ministries of tourism, who know that some viewers will want to see all the locations.
Tags: Da Vinci Code, Paganism, Gnosticism
Onward, Pagan soldiers
The issue of Sgt. Patrick Stewart’s Wiccan memorial marker “has legs,” as I would have said in my newspaper reporter days.
Driving to school today, I heard Carl Kasell update the story on NPR’s Morning Edition, and it occurred to me that that was the first time I had heard Wicca mentioned in an NPR newscast, as best I can remember. (I know that I heard it, but I cannot find a link. Hmm…)
NPR was probably following this Washington Post report.
There is the usual bureaucratic bafflegab:
Department spokeswoman Josephine Schuda said VA turned down Wiccans in the past because religious groups used to be required to list a headquarters or central authority, which Wicca does not have. But that requirement was eliminated last year, she noted.
“I really have no idea why it has taken so long” for the Wiccan symbol to gain approval, Schuda said.
His widow, Roberta, is supposed to be meeting this week with some undersecretary-for-something-or-other about the VA’s reluctance to admit the presence of Pagan military personnel.
In 1993, after the first Gulf War, Llewellyn published Circles, Groves, and Sanctuaries by Dan and Pauline Campanelli. It’s out of print now, of course, thanks to Llewellyn’s short-press-run philosophy and the federal tax code. You can find it on Advanced Book Exchange, though.
It included a photo of a soldier’s Wiccan circle in the desert of Kuwait (as I recall). I reckoned that that might have been one of the first Pagan rituals celebrated in that part of the world in about 1,300 years.
What I wanted to see was an M1 Abrams tank nicknamed “Chariot of Ishtar” (painted on the hull in English and cuneiform, please) rolling through Baghdad.
Margot Adler Speaks on Paganism Today
Margot Adler’s talk from the recent Unitarian Universalist General Assembly is summarized here, together with video links.
Jason Pitzl-Waters has more commentary. Here’s mine:
Adler, who became interested in paganism, and in particular, Wicca, during the sixties, remembers that in those days paganism was a coven-based movement. You had to join a coven to find out about paganism. No neighborhood coven? No connection.
She is looking back through the rose-tinted glasses of nostalgia and perhaps the filter of her own experience. Actually, there were plenty of people in the 1960s or 1970s who were solitary, who had read a book or two and started practising on their own. They believed that somewhere there were covens, but they had not found any. But that lack did not stop them.
The only difference was that solitary Witchcraft did not feel respectable until Scott Cunningham made it more so.
Gerald Gardner’s writing reached America in the 1950s, after all, and began having an immediate effect.
Tags:Paganism, Unitarians
‘Witch school’ Opens
What struck me most about this article on Ed Hubbard’s Witch School was not the culture-war angle (“Residents Petitioned and Prayed to Keep It Away”), but the sort-of positive response from Kirk White of Cherry Hill Seminary at the end.
One also could make comparisons with the Frosts’ School of Wicca during its heydey of the 1970s-1980s. In both cases, I think that the “enrollment” figures were inflated, but in the case of the Frosts, the content was actually worthwhile.
In the pre-Internet era, however, they took an awful lot of flak over the “mail-order Witchcraft” from traditional Witches–or from people who wanted you think that they were traditional Witches.
When it camed to head counts, the number of people who inquired was huge. The number of people who completed a course was quite small, perhaps because the courses did require some work and self-discipline.
You see the same thing in conventional online higher education. Students think it is easier than going to class. It is not. Ed Hubbard’s students are probably no different.
Tags: Witchcraft, Wicca, Online education
When students Google their teacher
At Quaker Pagan Reflections, Cat Chapin-Bishop struggles with levels of meaning and definition after one of her 9th-graders asks, “Are you a Witch?“
So there I am, clock ticking, a stack of quizzes in my hand, and for once all student eyes are on me. And about 50,000 things are going through my head at once, including:
– The urgent question, what does this kid think the word, “Witch” means?
– The urgent question, what do all the other kids in this classroom, and every member of their extended families, think the word “Witch” means?
– The comic comeback, “Nope, I stopped practicing and now I’m the real thing.”
– The importance of the separation of church and state.
– The reasonably large population of fundamentalist Christian families in my school district.
– The importance of plain speech and truth-telling.
Read the whole thing.
In my hot, sweaty hands
Yesterday I had my first email from someone who was reading Her Hidden Children: The Rise of Wicca and Paganism in America. That was great, but where were my copies? I fired off a plaintive email to my editor.
Today I came to the university, and there they were, sitting on a sofa in the departmental office. The secretary explained that she had needed a box. . . so she took mine. No problem. I had not come in last week because I was traveling.
I came up for a new description of the book, meanwhile:”How British Wicca Met American Nature Religion.”
It’s a good feeling, having it in my hands. Maybe now I can start concentrating on new projects.
The paperback is only $20 and it’s available from all the usual online sources. But if you order online from the publisher, you get 15 percent off, they say.
Tags: Wicca, Paganism, Pagan Studies
Techno-Pagans at work
A blogger covering the General Assembly of the Unitarian Universalists writes,
Dinner with Niko, the one other member of the New Bedford church besides me to be at General Assembly. He told me about the big outdoor solstice ritual that the pagan group held today. And how did they find a suitable outdoor space in downtown St. Louis within walking distance of the convention center? They used the satellite photos in Google Maps, and found a perfect little green space. There was even a grassy circle within a grove of trees.
I should mention that I am big fan of Mary Oliver too.
(Pointy) hat tip to Prairie Mary.
Brief blogging hiatus
I’m on the road this week. Blogging will re-commence after the 25th. Happy solstice, everyone.
Why Muslims want to kill us
Gordon Nickel, who teaches at a Christian university in Canada, discusses–verse by verse–all those Koranic commands about killing “unbelievers,” “idolators,” and “polytheists”.
At face value, therefore, polytheists appear to be at greater risk than Jews or Christians.
Yes, that would be us Pagans today, I think, not just someone in the Middle East centuries ago. You think differently?
Tags: Polytheism, Islam